Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2015 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2016 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2017 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2018 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2019 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2020 The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2015 Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney
Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2015 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2016 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2017 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2018 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2019 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2020 The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2015 Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney
ES
Español Hablamos
ZH
中文 我们说
Latest Case Results:
DV Assault in South Salt Lake County case dismissed Aggravated Robbery, Salt Lake County case dismissed Pre-file: Enticing a Minor Herriman Police Department the case was declined Pre-file: Rape The case was declined Aggravated Sexual Abuse of A Child not guilty on all counts Pre-file: Sexual Assault The case was declined Tooele County Justice Court entered a plea bargain Failed to drive with in a single line. motion to dismiss was granted Hit and Run case was dismissed Domestic Violence Harassment Case was dismissed Ulawful Sexual Contact not guilty on all counts Failure to Merge ruled not guilty DUI found the defendant not guilty Careless Driving Resulting in Death found the defendant not guilty
DV Assault in South Salt Lake County case dismissed Aggravated Robbery, Salt Lake County case dismissed Pre-file: Enticing a Minor Herriman Police Department the case was declined Pre-file: Rape The case was declined Aggravated Sexual Abuse of A Child not guilty on all counts Pre-file: Sexual Assault The case was declined Tooele County Justice Court entered a plea bargain Failed to drive with in a single line. motion to dismiss was granted Hit and Run case was dismissed Domestic Violence Harassment Case was dismissed Ulawful Sexual Contact not guilty on all counts Failure to Merge ruled not guilty DUI found the defendant not guilty Careless Driving Resulting in Death found the defendant not guilty

Fatal SR-198 Crash Near Coalinga: California Victims’ Rights

Facebook
LinkedIn
Reddit
X
WhatsApp
Print

A fatal collision on State Route 198 near Coalinga has once again drawn attention to the dangers of California’s rural highway intersections — and to the difficult legal questions that surviving families face in the aftermath. As personal injury attorneys, we know that the days after a serious highway crash can feel overwhelming. This article is written to help California families understand, in plain terms, who may be legally responsible after a wreck like this, what a wrongful death or serious-injury claim may involve, and what steps can protect a family’s rights while an investigation is still ongoing.

What Happened

According to reports citing the California Highway Patrol, a two-vehicle collision occurred on the afternoon of August 27, 2026, near the intersection of State Route 198 and Wartham Canyon Road in Fresno County, just outside Coalinga. The crash reportedly took place around 3:33 p.m. and involved a flatbed tow truck and a pickup truck that was pulling a trailer. Both vehicles allegedly came to rest on the right shoulder after impact.

Emergency responders reportedly had to extricate the drivers, who were said to be pinned inside their vehicles. Eastbound lanes of SR-198 were closed during the rescue, and one severely injured person was airlifted for emergency care. CHP later confirmed that one person died from injuries sustained in the crash. Investigators have not publicly identified whether speed, impairment, or a mechanical problem may have contributed. The matter remains under investigation.

Who May Be Liable

Until the CHP completes its investigation, no one should assume fault. That said, in a collision of this type, several categories of parties could potentially be held responsible under California law:

  • One or both drivers. If either motorist allegedly violated the Vehicle Code — for example, by failing to yield, following too closely, making an unsafe turn, or driving while impaired — that driver may be liable for the resulting harm.
  • An employer or commercial operator. Tow trucks are often operated in the course of employment. If the tow truck driver was on the job at the time, the employing company could be vicariously liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, and may also face direct claims for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance.
  • A trailer owner or loader. If the trailer being towed by the pickup was improperly loaded, poorly secured, or defective, the party responsible for its condition could be liable.
  • A vehicle or parts manufacturer. If a tire, brake system, hitch, or other component allegedly failed, a product liability claim against the manufacturer or distributor may be available.
  • A government entity. If the intersection’s design, signage, sight lines, or maintenance created a dangerous condition, a claim under California Government Code section 835 against the responsible public entity may be considered — but only if strict presentation-of-claim deadlines are met.

Each of these theories requires careful factual development. The point is simply that liability in a highway crash is rarely as narrow as it first appears.

Legal Theories That May Apply

  • Negligence. The foundation of most auto cases: proving that a driver breached the ordinary duty of care and caused harm.
  • Negligence per se. When a driver allegedly violates a safety statute — such as a right-of-way, speed, or DUI law — that violation can create a presumption of negligence.
  • Wrongful death (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.60). Certain surviving family members may bring a claim for the loss of a loved one killed by another’s wrongful conduct.
  • Survival action (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.30). The decedent’s estate may pursue claims the decedent could have brought had they survived, including for pre-death pain and economic losses.
  • Vicarious liability / respondeat superior. An employer may be responsible for the negligent acts of an employee driving in the scope of employment.
  • Negligent hiring, training, retention, or maintenance. Direct claims against a trucking or towing company for its own alleged failures.
  • Products liability. If a defective vehicle component contributed to the crash, strict liability may apply to the manufacturer or seller.
  • Dangerous condition of public property. If a public roadway or intersection was allegedly unsafe, a governmental entity could be liable subject to the Government Claims Act.

Damages Victims May Recover

California law recognizes a broad range of damages in serious-injury and wrongful death cases. Depending on the facts, a family or injured person may be entitled to seek:

  • Medical and rehabilitation expenses, including emergency transport, hospitalization, surgery, and ongoing care.
  • Lost income and loss of future earning capacity for an injured survivor or, in wrongful death, the financial support the decedent would have provided.
  • Funeral and burial expenses.
  • Loss of love, companionship, comfort, care, guidance, and consortium for eligible family members in a wrongful death case.
  • Household services the decedent would have provided.
  • Pain, suffering, disfigurement, and emotional distress in a survival or personal injury action.
  • Punitive damages, in rare cases involving alleged fraud, malice, or a conscious disregard for safety, such as impaired driving.

California’s pure comparative fault rule means that even if a driver or decedent is found partly at fault, compensation may still be available, reduced by that percentage.

Evidence That Strengthens a Case

Highway crash cases are won and lost on the quality of evidence. In an incident like this, key materials may include:

  • The complete CHP traffic collision report and any supplemental narratives.
  • 911 audio, CAD dispatch logs, and body-worn or dash-camera footage.
  • Scene photographs, drone imagery, and skid or gouge measurements.
  • Event data recorder (“black box”) downloads from both vehicles.
  • Commercial vehicle records: driver logs, hours-of-service, maintenance histories, DOT inspections, and pre-trip reports for the tow truck.
  • Trailer loading records, hitch and brake inspection documentation.
  • Toxicology, cell phone, and infotainment data (subject to subpoena).
  • Independent accident reconstruction and biomechanical expert analyses.
  • Witness statements taken promptly, before memories fade.
  • Medical records, autopsy findings, and coroner reports.

Much of this evidence is time-sensitive. Vehicles get repaired or scrapped, video is overwritten, and companies routinely destroy records on set retention schedules. Sending preservation-of-evidence (“spoliation”) letters early can be critical.

What to Do Next

If you or a loved one was involved in the SR-198 crash, or in a similar California highway collision, a few conservative steps can protect your rights:

  1. Get and document medical care. Even seemingly minor symptoms after a violent crash can mask serious injuries.
  2. Preserve everything. Keep the vehicle in its post-crash condition if possible, and save clothing, personal items, and photographs.
  3. Request the CHP report and keep a written timeline of what you remember.
  4. Be careful with insurance adjusters. You are generally not required to give a recorded statement to the other driver’s insurer, and doing so without counsel can hurt your claim.
  5. Watch the clock. California generally allows two years to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit, and only six months to present a claim against a government entity. Missing these deadlines can permanently bar recovery.
  6. Talk to a lawyer early. An attorney can send preservation letters, retain reconstructionists, and deal with insurers so your family can focus on healing.

If you have questions about a fatal or serious highway crash in California, the team at Weber Law LLP is here to listen. You can reach our office at 844-844-0503 or visit https://law.ninja for a free, confidential case review. There is no fee unless we recover for you.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I file a wrongful death claim in California if my family member died in a highway crash?

Yes. Under California Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60, a surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and certain other dependents may bring a wrongful death claim if a loved one was allegedly killed by another party’s negligence or wrongful act. An attorney can help identify who is legally eligible in your specific family situation.

What if the CHP has not decided who caused the crash yet?

You do not need to wait for law enforcement to finish its investigation to consult a lawyer. In fact, early legal involvement can help preserve evidence — such as vehicle data, video, and driver records — that may disappear before the CHP report is finalized. A civil case is separate from any criminal or traffic investigation.

Can I still recover money if my loved one was partly at fault?

Quite possibly. California follows a pure comparative fault rule, which means damages are reduced by the injured party’s percentage of fault but are not eliminated. Even a driver found significantly at fault may still recover a portion of their losses.

How long do I have to file a lawsuit after a fatal California crash?

For most wrongful death and personal injury cases, California’s statute of limitations is two years from the date of the incident. If a government entity may share blame — for example, for a dangerous roadway — a formal claim generally must be presented within six months. These deadlines are strict, so acting promptly is important.

What if a tow truck company or trucking company is involved?

Commercial vehicle cases often involve additional layers of liability, including the employer, contractors, and maintenance providers. Federal and state regulations impose specific safety duties, and violations can support both negligence and, in some cases, punitive damage claims. These cases also require rapid preservation of driver logs and electronic data.

Do I have to talk to the other driver’s insurance company?

Generally, no. You are not obligated to give a recorded statement to another party’s insurer, and early statements are frequently used to minimize claims. It is usually safer to speak with an attorney first.

What damages can a surviving family actually recover?

California wrongful death damages may include funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support, loss of household services, and the loss of the decedent’s love, companionship, care, and guidance. A survival action brought by the estate may also recover certain pre-death losses. The specific value depends on the facts, the decedent’s role in the family, and available insurance or assets.

How much does it cost to hire Weber Law LLP for a case like this?

Weber Law LLP handles personal injury and wrongful death matters on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront costs and no fee unless we obtain a recovery. Consultations are free and confidential. You can call 844-844-0503 or visit https://law.ninja to speak with our team.

Original reporting: rwbpress.com.