Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2015 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2016 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2017 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2018 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2019 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2020 The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2015 Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney
Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2015 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2016 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2017 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2018 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2019 Avvo Clients' Choice Award 2020 The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2015 Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney
ES
Español Hablamos
ZH
中文 我们说
Latest Case Results:
DV Assault in South Salt Lake County case dismissed Aggravated Robbery, Salt Lake County case dismissed Pre-file: Enticing a Minor Herriman Police Department the case was declined Pre-file: Rape The case was declined Aggravated Sexual Abuse of A Child not guilty on all counts Pre-file: Sexual Assault The case was declined Tooele County Justice Court entered a plea bargain Failed to drive with in a single line. motion to dismiss was granted Hit and Run case was dismissed Domestic Violence Harassment Case was dismissed Ulawful Sexual Contact not guilty on all counts Failure to Merge ruled not guilty DUI found the defendant not guilty Careless Driving Resulting in Death found the defendant not guilty
DV Assault in South Salt Lake County case dismissed Aggravated Robbery, Salt Lake County case dismissed Pre-file: Enticing a Minor Herriman Police Department the case was declined Pre-file: Rape The case was declined Aggravated Sexual Abuse of A Child not guilty on all counts Pre-file: Sexual Assault The case was declined Tooele County Justice Court entered a plea bargain Failed to drive with in a single line. motion to dismiss was granted Hit and Run case was dismissed Domestic Violence Harassment Case was dismissed Ulawful Sexual Contact not guilty on all counts Failure to Merge ruled not guilty DUI found the defendant not guilty Careless Driving Resulting in Death found the defendant not guilty

ICE Arrest After CA Murder Conviction: Crimmigration Risks

Facebook
LinkedIn
Reddit
X
WhatsApp
Print

What Happened

According to recent reports, a Kenyan national who was previously convicted of murder in Compton, California has been taken into federal immigration custody. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), operating under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), reportedly detained the man as part of a broader nationwide enforcement push aimed at non-citizens with serious criminal records.

Federal officials did not publicly disclose the specifics of the individual’s immigration status, when his criminal sentence concluded, or where he currently stands in removal proceedings. What is clear from the reporting is that the case is being publicized as an example of ICE’s focus on people with felony convictions — particularly those involving violence, sex offenses, or narcotics trafficking. The reports also note that dozens of Kenyan nationals have allegedly been arrested by ICE in recent months, and that overall removals and voluntary departures have surged under the current administration.

For California residents who are not U.S. citizens — or who have loved ones who are not — this story is a stark reminder that a criminal case in state court is often only the first chapter. The second chapter, immigration consequences, can be far longer and far more permanent.

Who May Be Liable — And Who Is at Risk

Unlike a personal injury story, a crimmigration case is not about a defendant “paying damages.” It is about a non-citizen defendant potentially losing their ability to stay in the United States. The parties whose decisions may shape that outcome include:

  • The individual non-citizen defendant, who may face both criminal penalties and later removal proceedings.
  • Prior defense counsel, who could be exposed to an ineffective-assistance claim if the non-citizen was allegedly not properly advised of immigration consequences, as required by Padilla v. Kentucky (2010).
  • Prosecutors and the state court, whose charging and plea decisions may determine whether a conviction is classified as an “aggravated felony” or “crime involving moral turpitude” under federal immigration law.
  • Federal agencies (DHS/ICE), which have significant but not unlimited discretion in initiating and pursuing removal.

This article does not suggest that any specific person is legally liable for anything. It is written to help lawful permanent residents, visa holders, DACA recipients, asylees, and undocumented Californians understand where risk lives and how a criminal defense attorney may help reduce it.

Legal Theories and Defenses That May Apply

When a non-citizen faces criminal charges in California, several overlapping bodies of law come into play. Each of the following may be relevant depending on the facts:

  • Padilla-based ineffective assistance of counsel. If a defense attorney allegedly failed to advise a non-citizen client that a plea could trigger deportation, a post-conviction challenge may be available.
  • California Penal Code § 1473.7. This statute allows a person no longer in criminal custody to move to vacate a conviction that was legally invalid due to prejudicial error damaging their ability to meaningfully understand the immigration consequences of a plea.
  • Penal Code § 1016.5 advisement challenges. California requires trial courts to advise defendants of potential immigration consequences before accepting a plea; a failure to do so may support a motion to withdraw the plea.
  • Immigration-safe plea negotiation. A criminal defense lawyer may attempt to negotiate charges or sentence structures that avoid triggering “aggravated felony” or “crime involving moral turpitude” classifications under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43).
  • Relief from removal. In immigration court, respondents may seek cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding, protection under the Convention Against Torture, or a U- or T-visa, depending on eligibility.
  • Habeas corpus. In limited circumstances, a non-citizen may challenge prolonged or unlawful detention through federal habeas.

These are potential avenues only — every case turns on its own facts, and eligibility for any given form of relief may be narrow.

What Is at Stake for the Non-Citizen and Their Family

Instead of the traditional damages framework, the stakes in a crimmigration matter often include:

  • Loss of lawful status (green card, visa, TPS, DACA, asylum).
  • Mandatory detention during removal proceedings for certain offenses.
  • Permanent bars to reentry after removal for an aggravated felony.
  • Family separation, including impact on U.S.-citizen children and spouses.
  • Loss of employment and professional licenses.
  • Collateral consequences such as ineligibility for naturalization or future immigration benefits.

For families in California, Colorado, and Utah, these consequences are often more devastating than the criminal sentence itself. A short jail term can be followed by lifetime exile.

Evidence That Strengthens a Case

Whether you are fighting the underlying criminal charge, seeking post-conviction relief, or defending against removal, documentation matters. Materials that may be critical include:

  • Complete copies of the criminal file: charging documents, plea transcripts, minute orders, and any § 1016.5 advisements.
  • Prior defense counsel’s file and any written communications about immigration consequences.
  • Immigration records: I-94, green card, visa applications, prior USCIS filings, and any Notices to Appear.
  • Evidence of rehabilitation: certificates from programs, employment history, letters from clergy, employers, and family.
  • Proof of family ties in the U.S., including birth certificates of U.S.-citizen children and medical records showing hardship.
  • Country-conditions evidence if asylum, withholding, or CAT protection may be at issue.
  • Any expert reports (psychological, medical, country-conditions) that may support relief.

Preserving this record early — before ICE moves the client to a remote facility — can be the difference between staying and being removed.

What to Do Next

If you or someone you love is a non-citizen in California facing criminal charges, or has an older conviction that could now be triggering ICE interest, take these steps as soon as possible:

  1. Do not speak with ICE, DHS, or law enforcement without an attorney. You generally have the right to remain silent and to request counsel.
  2. Do not sign any document — especially a “stipulated removal” or voluntary departure form — without legal advice.
  3. Preserve your paperwork. Gather your immigration documents, criminal records, and family documents in one place, and give copies to a trusted person.
  4. Act quickly on deadlines. Motions to vacate under Penal Code § 1473.7, appeals, and immigration filings all have strict time limits.
  5. Consult a criminal defense attorney who understands immigration consequences before accepting any plea, even for a misdemeanor.

At Weber Law LLP, founding attorney Thomas D. Weber and our criminal defense team work with non-citizen clients and their families across California, Colorado, and Utah to protect both their freedom and their future in this country. If you’re worried about how a criminal case — new or old — could affect immigration status, we encourage you to reach out for a confidential consultation at 844-844-0503 or through law.ninja.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be deported after finishing my California prison sentence?

Yes. Non-citizens who complete a state sentence in California may be transferred directly to ICE custody, particularly when the conviction is alleged to be an aggravated felony or crime involving moral turpitude under federal immigration law. Even lawful permanent residents can be placed in removal proceedings after serving their time.

What if my criminal lawyer never told me my plea could get me deported?

Under Padilla v. Kentucky, defense counsel is constitutionally required to advise non-citizen clients about the immigration consequences of a plea. If that advice was allegedly missing or wrong, you may be able to file a motion to vacate the conviction under California Penal Code § 1473.7 or pursue a habeas petition. Speak to a post-conviction attorney quickly, because these motions have procedural requirements.

How long do I have to challenge an old conviction that is now causing immigration problems?

California Penal Code § 1473.7 does not have a fixed statute of limitations, but the law requires that motions be filed with “reasonable diligence” after you learn the conviction is triggering immigration consequences. Waiting too long may be treated as a reason to deny relief, so it is important to act as soon as ICE contact, a Notice to Appear, or a denied immigration benefit puts you on notice.

Does every criminal conviction lead to deportation?

No. Many offenses — especially minor infractions and certain misdemeanors — do not trigger removal. However, categories like aggravated felonies, controlled substance offenses, domestic violence crimes, and firearms offenses may lead to mandatory removal, so any case involving a non-citizen should be evaluated with immigration consequences in mind.

Can ICE arrest me at the courthouse or at home in California?

ICE has conducted enforcement actions at homes, workplaces, and, in some cases, near courthouses. California has passed laws limiting cooperation between state agencies and ICE, but federal agents may still act independently. If ICE comes to your door, you generally do not have to open it unless they present a judicial warrant signed by a judge — not just an administrative ICE form.

What is an “aggravated felony” for immigration purposes?

An aggravated felony is a federal immigration classification listed at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). It includes a broad range of offenses — some of which are not even felonies under state law — such as certain theft, fraud, drug, and violent offenses. A conviction classified as an aggravated felony can bar most forms of relief from removal, which is why plea structuring is critical.

Can my U.S.-citizen family members help stop my deportation?

Sometimes. Certain forms of relief, such as cancellation of removal for lawful permanent residents or non-permanent residents, may consider hardship to U.S.-citizen or lawful-permanent-resident family members. Family ties alone do not guarantee relief, but strong evidence of hardship, community involvement, and rehabilitation can support a case.

Should I talk to ICE if they promise to “help” my case?

No. You should not answer questions or sign paperwork without consulting an attorney. Statements made to ICE can be used against you in removal proceedings, and “voluntary departure” or “stipulated removal” forms may waive rights you did not know you had.

Original reporting: mwakilishi.com.